Protect Your Reputation and Your Investment with Accurate Energy Ratings

September 23, 2014

Non NFRC certified commercial window energy ratings are frequently submitted for energy code compliance.  Documents submitted making reference to NFRC 100 and NFRC 200, which can vary widely, may be submitted as evidence of energy code compliance, but they may not meet the NFRC 100 and/or 200 requirements for the reasons described below.

If a submitted document references testing to  NFRC 100, it may not comply, since NFRC 100, section 4.1.1 (compliance, product line simulation and testing) mandates each product line must have an associated validation test.  For products rated using CMAST, section 5.9.4 requires each framing product line to have an associated validation test. A code compliance document referencing NFRC 100 and/or 200, without the required associated product line validation test, does not fully comply with NFRC 100 and should not be accepted as proof of energy code compliance. The same is true of a CMAST bid report, unless it is using approved framing components, not those in the design stage, which then have a validation test associated with the framing product line.

National energy code documents, such as the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), CA Title 24, and ASHRAE 90.1, require window energy performance be determined according to NFRC 100 and NFRC 200. Without the required validation testing, NFRC 100 and 200 requirements are not fully satisfied.

Therefore, according to NFRC, any non-validated NFRC 100 (U-factor) referencing report or document may not be fully NFRC 100 and 200 compliant and may not satisfy the IECC, CA Title 24, and ASHRAE 90.1 code requirements for NFRC 100 and 200. These documents should not be used for energy code compliance without the required validation testing documentation for the associated product line (or using approved framing components in CMAST). Please contact NFRC with questions on any energy code document where this may apply.

For more information, contact Bruce Croak, Graham Architectural Products technical marketing manager, 717-849-8100.

This article originally appeared on the NFRC website.

Why Third Party Certification Should Be Your First Choice

September 18, 2014

When you buy windows, doors or skylights that are promoted as more energy efficient, you want to be sure they are going to perform as advertised. One way to make a more educated choice is to understand how they were …

Design Activity in the Third Quarter Opens with a Bang

September 15, 2014

As of July, U.S. architecture firms have produced three straight months of accelerating gains in design billings. With a reading of 55.8 for the month (where any score above 50 signifies growth), the July reading reflects stronger gains in billings …

AAMA Releases Updated Voluntary Specification for Sash Balances

August 7, 2014

The American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA) has released AAMA 902-14, Voluntary Specification for Sash Balances. This document establishes the requirements for the materials, testing and performance for sash balances used in hung-type windows. It also provides rating criteria and test …